Skip to content
Case File · MTI-2026-0603 · Clone Firm

Bristol Assets Cloned a Trusted Name — 92% Recovered for an Edinburgh Investor

Bristol Assets did not invent a brand — it borrowed a credible one, presenting itself with the look and references of an established firm. That credibility cost our client £118,000. Fast, documented action recovered almost all of it.

VectorClone of a regulated firm
InstrumentBank transfer → BTC
Reported loss£118,000
Recovered92%
ClientAlan W., Edinburgh, UK

ABackground

Our client received a polished approach from “Bristol Assets,” complete with professional documents and references designed to mirror a regulated firm he half-recognised. The pitch was a fixed-term bond paying well above market.

He transferred funds by bank in stages, reassured at each step by responsive “relationship managers” and official-looking statements.

BWhere it turned

When the first “interest payment” was late, the explanations grew elaborate and a new “release fee” appeared. The funds had already been converted to Bitcoin and moved out of reach of the bank alone.

Clone-firm fraud works because the victim believes they are dealing with a name they can trust — the impersonation is the entire weapon.

I checked the name and it looked real. I never imagined someone had simply copied it.— Alan W., Edinburgh, UK

COur engagement

  1. 01
    Intake and verification

    We confirmed the impersonation against the genuine firm’s details and assembled the transfer chain and Bristol Assets documents.

  2. 02
    Authorised push payment claim

    We filed a strong APP reimbursement claim with the sending bank, evidencing the clone and the deception.

  3. 03
    On-chain tracing

    The converted Bitcoin was traced to an exchange deposit before it could be withdrawn.

  4. 04
    Freeze and reporting

    We reported Bristol Assets to Action Fraud and the regulator and filed a freeze request with the exchange.

  5. 05
    Recovery

    The bank reimbursed the bulk of the loss and the exchange returned the traced deposit.

Recovery outcome92%

£108,600 — about 92% — was recovered, through a well-evidenced bank reimbursement combined with an exchange freeze on the converted funds. Acting before the final off-ramp made the difference.

DRisk indicators

  • An “established” firm that approaches you first, out of the blue.
  • Names and references that closely echo a real regulated company.
  • Returns or bonds paying noticeably above the market.
  • A “release fee” or delay when the first payout is due.
  • Pressure to transfer in stages before you can verify independently.

Think you have a similar case?

Our advisory team reviews engagements confidentially and tells you honestly what is recoverable before you commit to anything.

Request a confidential case review
Speak to a recovery advisor now — free, confidential case review. +1 (332) 203-7050
Call now